|
There has
been so much distortion of the facts relating to P G Wodehouse’s
wartime experiences over the years that the Society believes that
a fully researched paper putting the events in their proper
context is an essential tool for all those wishing to refer to
this period for their various purposes. Accordingly this
Information Sheet has been produced, with a brief ‘executive
summary’ (click here to view)
guide to where the different aspects of the matter can be found. |
|
1 |
How true it is that many of life’s misfortunes have their
origins in wholly unrelated decisions made for valid reasons. P G
Wodehouse’s wartime experiences, triggered by the unlikely
combination of tax laws and quarantine restrictions, are a good
example. |
|
2 |
As a playwright, lyricist and author, ‘Plum’ had been in
heavy demand on both sides of the Atlantic throughout the
inter-war period, and the only way in which he could meet his
contractual obligations was by becoming one of the first
transatlantic commuters. But for a man with substantial annual
earnings in both the United Kingdom and the United States this
generated significant tax complications. Put simply, he was liable
to pay income tax twice on his earnings from either the US or the
UK, depending on which of the two countries he spent most time in
each year. |
|
3 |
Tax law has become less draconian since then, with
international conventions to prevent double taxation, but in the
1920s and 30s international taxation was in an immature state of
development. Wodehouse’s advisers put forward several
suggestions to reduce his tax bill to a fair level. Eventually he
adopted what seemed the most sensible, though not a terribly
convenient, suggestion: to establish a home in France and pay UK
tax on British earnings and US tax on American earnings. So in
1934 he settled in Le Touquet, from where he could easily travel
to Paris to work with Guy Bolton, to Shipbourne in Kent to see his
step-daughter Leonora and her husband Peter Cazalet, and to
Dulwich in London, to his old College where he still liked to
watch rugby and cricket matches. |
|
4 |
There was already a substantial British presence in Le Touquet
and the Wodehouses became good friends with their neighbours,
Arthur Grant, the golf professional, and his family. As the threat
of a German invasion became more serious, Ethel Wodehouse was
generous in her hospitality to the British officers in the area
and offered what amounted to open house. The Wodehouses had
billeted with them two French military doctors and were in contact
with the British Vice-Consul in Boulogne. With these various
sources of information they expected to be able to leave in good
time if it became necessary. |
|
5 |
Although some British residents left Le Touquet long before the
Germans arrived, the Wodehouses stayed for one major and one minor
reason. The major reason was that they couldn’t bear the thought
of putting their Peke, Wonder, in quarantine for the six months
that would be required on their return to Britain. The lesser
reason was that, like quite a number of other residents who
remained, they did not want to be thought to have panicked or to
have lost confidence in the British forces by leaving before it
was essential. |
|
6 |
On May 20th, 1940, Ethel Wodehouse drove to the British
Military hospital at Étaples and was reassured by the Commanding
Officer about the limited progress of the German advance.
Nevertheless, the following day they did leave for a port, but
broke down within two miles. Returning home they joined the Grants
and others in a small convoy of three vehicles which set off
together. Unfortunately, again, one of the vehicles broke down and
by the time repairs had been effected and the entire party
reunited it was early evening, so a quick decision was made to try
again the following day. |
|
7 |
Overnight the Germans took Le Touquet. |
|
8 |
After some weeks during which Plum had to report daily to the
town square, the German Army interned all male alien nationals
under 60 (releasing them as a matter of course when they reached
that age), and as he was only 58¾ Plum was included in the
round-up. He was taken with many others to a series of temporary
lodgings in prison camps until he arrived in an old mental asylum
at Tost, in Upper Silesia. |
|
9 |
During this period he kept a camp diary, which he adapted into
a series of entertaining talks for his fellow-internees that were,
according to one listener, the distinguished historian Barrie
Pitt, received with much laughter and applause. Written with
typical humour and panache, and reflecting the code of honour
among British prisoners that they did not whine, they showed how
the British could maintain their spirits in adversity. |
|
10 |
Meanwhile, Wodehouse’s American public, particularly the
readers of the Saturday Evening Post, in which the majority
of his novels had been serialised during the inter-war period, had
been seeking information about his whereabouts and his treatment.
He had received many letters to which he was not permitted to
reply (as well as a few food parcels), and a petition for his
release, signed by many of those in prominent positions in
American artistic associations, had been organised and presented
to the German Embassy in Washington on his behalf in June 1940. |
|
11 |
America was still neutral and not yet in the war, so a crucial
plank in German foreign policy was to try to maintain her
neutrality. The idea of releasing Wodehouse early was the
brainchild of Dr Paul Schmidt, the Head of the private office of
the German Foreign Secretary, Ribbentrop. Schmidt felt that
releasing Wodehouse a few months early would be a relatively
simple matter about which to obtain the agreement of other German
ministries, and would demonstrate to the Americans that Germans
were caring properly for a non-Nazi internee. Schmidt’s plan hit
a snag, though, when Goebbels and the Propaganda Ministry refused
to agree to Wodehouse’s release. |
|
12 |
At this point the mixture was enriched by the entry of a second Paul
Schmidt, the Director of the German Foreign Office's American department.
He had been Hitler's interpreter and was an admirer of Wodehouse's novels.
Prompted by brief messages broadcast by many British prisoners of war to
reassure their families that they were still alive, Schmidt came up with the
idea that Wodehouse should not only be released early, but be invited to
broadcast to neutral America along the same light-hearted lines as his talks
to fellow-internees. This time, Goebbels's ministry agreed. |
|
13 |
Wodehouse knew nothing of the behind-the-scenes posturing and
was both surprised and relieved when he was released, unexpectedly
and without warning, some 3½ months before he was sixty, the date
when he expected to be freed. He was taken to Berlin, where the
German Foreign Office had arranged that he should come across
Werner Plack, who had been an acquaintance of Plum while they were
working together in Hollywood. The task assigned to Plack, who was
now working in the German Foreign Office, was to facilitate a
proposal that Wodehouse might like to contact his friends in
America by making broadcasts about his experiences. |
|
14 |
Wodehouse was, as is generally acknowledged, a compulsive
writer. He had always made it his business to reply to any fan
mail and felt uncomfortable that he had not been able to reply
from camp to his correspondents. The possibility of making the
broadcasts seemed to him to be a much-needed opportunity to thank
them and tell them that he was surviving, and remaining cheerful.
(Interestingly, the texts, which were substantially those of his
camp diary and talk to fellow-internees, seem not to have been
censored by the Germans.) |
|
15 |
At the outset of his interview with Major Cussen of MI5 and in his first
written statement, Plum reported that he had received 250 marks (about £20)
from Plack for the broadcasts, but Plack was insistent that no such payment
was made. After the first had been recorded, Plum went to spend the summer
away from Berlin with the cousin of a German Hollywood friend Baron von
Barnekow. The Baron opposed the Nazi regime and shot himself a year later
in deep depression about its activities. The 250 marks referred to by
Wodehouse is most likely to have been a contribution to the costs his hosts
incurred in driving him back to Berlin for two more recording sessions. |
|
16 |
It is clear that there was no ‘deal’ to free Wodehouse in
return for a promise to broadcast. Werner Plack was to emphasise
to Iain Sproat, when they met in the 1970s while Iain was
researching his book Wodehouse at War, that the whole point
of releasing Wodehouse and then persuading him to broadcast
was that he was not a Nazi sympathiser and in no way a
collaborator. Had he been either of those things, there would have
been nothing surprising about his release, and thus no potential
benefit to the Germans by way of positive reaction from America
for permitting the broadcasts.
|
|
17 |
Tragically for Wodehouse, after the broadcasts had been
recorded, Goebbels’s Propaganda Ministry changed its mind and
decided, to the fury of the German Foreign Office, that there was
more mileage to be gained from portraying Wodehouse as a Nazi
sympathiser, and it began a campaign to persuade neutral
journalists that this was the case. It also arranged a second
broadcast of the recorded talks, this time to the UK, without the
approval of the German Foreign Office. The very fact of the
broadcasts (self-evidently outside Wodehouse’s control) as
opposed to their content was to continue to fuel the adverse
reaction in Britain. |
|
18 |
The British Government’s immediate reaction was
understandably one of dismay, but it is to their discredit that no
attempt was made to discover the underlying circumstances. The
incumbent Minister of Information, Duff Cooper, was under pressure
to allow British journalists a greater say in the British
propaganda war, and it so happened that Duff Cooper had arranged a
lunch with a group of six journalists (including William Connor,
who signed his regular column in the Daily Mirror with the
pseudonym Cassandra) to discuss possible opportunities.
Contemporary accounts from three of those present indicate that
after a good deal of vodka and brandy had been drunk, there seems
to have been an invitation from Duff Cooper to Cassandra to make a
broadcast about Wodehouse with the promise that he could say
whatever he liked. |
|
19 |
The result was that the BBC broadcast Cassandra’s highly
scurrilous and libellous tirade. They initially refused to do so,
but Duff Cooper used wartime regulations to insist that it went
ahead. Even then the BBC demanded a written instruction from him,
including an indemnity against costs and damages in any libel suit
after the war. Connor made no pretence of having heard any of
Wodehouse’s broadcasts, or of producing facts to support his
assertions, but launched into his target with words of vitriol. It
says a great deal for Wodehouse’s benign and gentle personality
that when he met Connor after the war in New York, he was willing
to have an amicable lunch and maintain a friendly correspondence. |
|
20 |
After the broadcasts, Plack was detailed by the German Foreign
Office to act as Plum’s ‘minder’, a role that was de
facto extended to cover Ethel when she was allowed to join her
husband in Berlin. He did this willingly, feeling, as did the
second Paul Schmidt, considerable responsibility for having
inadvertently brought about the now widespread but wholly
erroneous belief that Wodehouse was a traitor. Schmidt gave Plack
three instructions: that he was to see the Wodehouses regularly
(making sure they got into no trouble, and offering help and
advice when it could be done without compromising them); that he
should encourage Wodehouse to resume writing so he could earn a
living without any possible need to receive money from the German
government; and to ensure that he never met any of the real
British traitors. |
|
21 |
After requiring the Wodehouses to remain in Germany until
September 1943, the German authorities eventually allowed them to
return to Paris, and as soon as the Allies arrived, Plum reported
to the British forces. After a preliminary interview with Malcolm
Muggeridge, then a British Intelligence Corps Major, his actions
were thoroughly investigated by Major Cussen of MI5. Under the
government’s rules relating to the provision of information, all
the extensive papers and records of interviews and researches
which then took place are now available to the public. |
|
22 |
Wodehouse never received money from the German government. The
evidence of Wodehouse’s statement to Major Cussen, and Werner
Plack’s subsequent discussions with Iain Sproat, make it clear
that he paid for himself and Ethel both while they were in Germany
and later in France. In each country they paid their own hotel
bill. Their sources of funds were varied: royalty payments from
neutral countries; borrowings from acquaintances which were to be
repaid after the war; the sale of Ethel’s jewellery; selling to
a German company the film rights to his novel Heavy Weather
on condition first that no propaganda use was made of this and
secondly that the film was not released until after the war; and
selling a short story to a Paris newspaper. |
|
23 |
Despite the impression given to the contrary by the national
press, the various sums of money listed in the German Embassy
files obtained by MI5 in 1946, and first disclosed to the UK
public in September 1999, are capable of ready and simple
explanations which accord with previously available information.
The sum of 580,000 French francs ‘given’ to Wodehouse by the
Embassy in Paris in October 1943 is the same 30,000 marks which
Wodehouse told Cussen was the maximum he had been permitted to
take from Germany under currency regulations. This sum represented
about half the amount the Wodehouses had raised whilst in Berlin
but not yet spent, the other half being left with Plack in Germany
for safe-keeping. |
|
24 |
Ethel Wodehouse was to complain about the slowness with which
Plack returned the remainder of the money, but even he still
needed to be careful about the currency regulations. Iain Sproat
believes from his discussions with Plack that the 100,000 francs
(£ 250) described in the Embassy papers as ‘travelling expenses’
would have been a small instalment towards that repayment, the
remainder of which he was able to arrange through the Swiss
Consulate in Paris in September 1944, as explained in Major Cussen’s
report. |
|
25 |
The final references to financial matters in the MI5 papers
were to payments of 180,000, 60,000 and 60,000 francs (in total,
£ 750) made in June, July and August 1944. MI5 at first suspected
that these may have been payments for work done on behalf of the
Nazis, but they later rejected this conclusion. In fact the
payments correlate, as reasonably as could be expected in the
circumstances, to the sum of 320,000 francs which Wodehouse listed
in his statement to Cussen as having been received as royalties
from his Spanish publisher, Jose Janes, which of course had to be
paid through the German authorities. |
|
26 |
The Embassy files also mentioned other curious matters, such as
an enquiry as to whether the Wodehouses might be entitled to
receive soap and cigarette rations through the Embassy, and a
request to German military authorities to ensure that Low Wood,
the Wodehouses’ home in Le Touquet, was maintained in good
order. Iain Sproat is sure, from his talks with Plack, that these
were part of Plack’s response to the instruction to look after
the Wodehouses without compromising them. |
|
27 |
Major Cussen was so convinced of Wodehouse’s innocence that
in his report he wholly exonerated him from being liable to any
charge, and the British Government’s legal advisers concluded in
1944 that there were no grounds for prosecution. Wodehouse had
been, in the quite exceptional circumstances, naive and foolish,
but no more than that. |
|
28 |
But this is not how Ministers explained it in Parliament. A
caveat was added that no guarantee could be given that there might
not be some prosecution if he were to return to England in the
event that any new evidence were to appear. |
|
29 |
As indicated above, around the end of 1946 a number of files
taken from the German Embassy in Paris were studied by MI5 and
extensive efforts were made to produce relevant evidence. The
emphasis placed on the matter by different UK government
departments can be illustrated by the following extracts from
inter-departmental correspondence in 1946 and 1947: |
|
|
1 In a manuscript comment on one memo, dated 30 December,
1946, Mr G C Allchin, Head of the Consular Department at the
Foreign Office, wrote:
|
|
|
"I think it unlikely that the payments to PGW were in
reward for pro-German activities. They are probably advances
from his own funds in France or derived from Switzerland or
elsewhere. These funds were of course controlled by the German
authorities."
|
|
|
2 On 4 June, 1947, several months after the payments in
question were known to all the authorities concerned, another
member of the Foreign Office staff had commented, after
receiving information from a member of his staff that had been
requested by MI5:
|
|
|
"I feel bound to observe that it seems to me most
regrettable that we should still be pursuing this matter more
than two years after the end of the war in Europe. I do not
think that anyone would seriously deny that ‘L’affaire
Wodehouse’ was very much a storm in a teacup. It is
perfectly plain to any unbiased observer that Mr Wodehouse
made the celebrated broadcasts in all innocence and without
any evil intent. He is reported to be of an entirely
apolitical cast of mind; much of the furore of course was the
result of literary jealousies.
|
|
|
Assuming that the present payments prove to have been
innocuous I would suggest that in any reply we may make to Mr
Wakefield we should take occasion to deprecate MI5’s
apparent enthusiasm for the chase and to indicate that in our
view this matter is trivial in itself and at the distance of
time, cast off into oblivion . . . "
|
|
|
3 Whilst trying to assist Mr Wakefield with his
investigations, the Foreign Office also conducted a search for
mentions of Wodehouse in German documents, but Mr A C Johnston
confirmed on 21 July, 1947 that "there is no sign of him in
the lists of British broadcasters for the enemy".
|
|
|
4 Mr G H Wakefield of MI5 spent several months trying to
obtain specific information about four payments (those of
100,000, 180,000, 60,000 and 60,000 francs mentioned above) made
between May and August 1944, presumably to add to the weight of
evidence should any prosecution take place. After failing to do
so, he wrote on 25 July, 1947 to Mr Allchin:
|
|
|
"I feel fairly confident . . . that if he were doing
anything at all to earn these payments – of which we have no
evidence whatsoever – it was not of a very treasonable
character."
|
|
|
On receiving this letter a member of the Foreign Office staff
had added "I hope that this file is now finally
closed", and Mr Allchin, in his reply to Wakefield, wrote:
|
|
|
"It looks as if the file might now be closed, never,
let us hope, to be re-opened."
|
|
30 |
It has been suggested that the MI5 papers from 1946 and 1947
show that, if he had returned to the UK, Wodehouse would
have been prosecuted, as a result of the disclosure
of the payments made through the German Embassy in Paris.
This is NOT the case for two reasons. First, although the
Director of Public Prosecutions had previously advised that there
were no grounds on which to proceed in any action, a letter of 18
December, 1946 to Mr Wakefield from Mr B A Hill, reporting a
conversation with the Director, makes it clear that the Director’s
view had changed somewhat, having been influenced not by the
evidence of the payments but by a new interpretation of the law
relating to broadcasts on enemy radio. The Judge in the William
Joyce (Lord Haw-Haw) case had ruled that the motive
that prompted a broadcast should be regarded as immaterial. In the
light of this new interpretation, the Director now believed that
if Wodehouse were now brought to trial a jury could
be invited to decide his innocence or guilt in relation to the
1941 broadcasts (which had been light-hearted in content and made
to a neutral America). |
|
31 |
But secondly, the letter records that in any event NO
final decision whether or not to prosecute was taken as Wodehouse
was not in the country. |
|
32 |
So Plum Wodehouse received no formal clearance at that time to
return to the UK, and in 1947 he and Ethel sailed from France to
America where they lived with their dogs and other animals on Long
Island. It was not until the early 1960s that a clearance to
return was given, on request, by the then Attorney General.
However by 1955 Plum, at the age of 74, had taken American
citizenship and the lingering possibility of a return visit to the
UK had finally disappeared. Happily the Knighthood that he was
awarded shortly before his death in 1975 made some amends to him
for having been physically cut off from the one country in the
world that he loved above all others. |